What Is TAR?
Definition of TAR
Before diving into the advantages of TAR, it's important to understand what it is. TAR, also known as predictive coding, is a process that uses technology to assist in the review of documents during eDiscovery. Rather than manually reviewing each document, TAR uses algorithms to identify relevant documents based on a set of criteria.
How TAR Works
TAR begins with a set of seed documents that are reviewed and coded by a human reviewer. The algorithm then uses these seed documents to identify similar documents within the larger dataset. The algorithm continues to learn and refine its results as more documents are reviewed, ultimately reducing the number of documents that need to be manually reviewed.
Advantages of Using TAR
One of the main advantages of using TAR is the time and cost savings. TAR significantly reduces the amount of time and resources required for manual review, allowing legal professionals to focus on other aspects of the case. Additionally, TAR has been shown to be more accurate than manual review, as the algorithm is able to identify relevant documents that may have been missed by a human reviewer.
Types of TAR
There are several types of TAR, including:
Machine Learning in TAR
Definition of Machine Learning
Machine learning plays a crucial role in TAR, as it allows the algorithm to continually learn and refine its results. It is a subset of artificial intelligence (AI) that involves teaching computers to learn from data without being explicitly programmed.
Role of Machine Learning in TAR
Machine learning is used in TAR to identify relevant documents based on a set of criteria, such as keywords or metadata. The algorithm learns from the seed set and applies those learnings to the larger dataset, ultimately reducing the number of documents that need to be manually reviewed.
How Machine Learning Helps in TAR
Machine learning helps in TAR by improving the accuracy and efficiency of the review process. The algorithm is able to identify relevant documents that may have been missed by a human reviewer, ultimately reducing the amount of time and resources required for manual review.
Types of Machine Learning
There are several types of machine learning, including:
Active Learning AI
Definition of Active Learning AI
Active learning AI is a type of machine learning that involves ongoing feedback from both the algorithm and the human reviewer. It is able to continually refine its results based on the feedback provided, ultimately reducing the number of documents that need to be manually reviewed.
How Active Learning AI Works
Active learning AI begins with a set of seed documents that are reviewed and coded by a human reviewer. The algorithm then uses these seed documents to identify similar documents within the larger dataset. The human reviewer provides ongoing feedback to the algorithm, allowing it to continually refine its results and reduce the number of documents that need to be manually reviewed.
Advantages of Using Active Learning AI in TAR
One of the main advantages of using active learning AI in TAR is the ability to continually refine the results based on ongoing feedback from both the algorithm and the human reviewer. This ultimately reduces the number of documents that need to be manually reviewed, saving time and resources. Additionally, active learning AI has been shown to be more accurate than other types of TAR, as it is able to learn and refine its results based on the specific needs of the case.
Examples of Active Learning AI in TAR
There have been several successful examples of active learning AI in TAR, including the use of TAR in the Volkswagen emissions scandal and the Rio Tinto bribery case. In both cases, TAR was able to significantly reduce the amount of time and resources required for manual review, ultimately resulting in successful outcomes for the legal teams involved.
eDiscovery and TAR
The use of eDiscovery TAR is becoming increasingly important as the volume of electronic data continues to grow. TAR can help streamline the eDiscovery process, allowing legal professionals to focus on other aspects of the case. Additionally, TAR has been shown to be more accurate than manual review, reducing the risk of missing relevant documents.
Importance of TAR in eDiscovery
The importance of TAR in eDiscovery cannot be overstated. TAR significantly reduces the time and resources required for manual review, ultimately saving clients money and allowing legal professionals to focus on other aspects of the case. TAR has also been shown to be more accurate than manual review, reducing the risk of missing relevant documents.
How TAR Can Streamline eDiscovery
TAR can streamline eDiscovery by reducing the number of documents that need to be manually reviewed. This ultimately saves time and resources, allowing legal professionals to focus on other aspects of the case. TAR can help identify relevant documents that may have been missed by a human reviewer, reducing the risk of missing important information.
Advantages of AI-Assisted Review in eDiscovery
Increased Efficiency and Speed
One of the primary advantages of TAR is that it significantly improves the efficiency and speed of the document review process. With eDiscovery TAR, legal professionals can quickly analyze large volumes of data and identify relevant documents without having to manually review each one. This not only saves time but also reduces the risk of human error.
TAR uses machine learning algorithms to analyze documents and identify patterns, keywords, and other relevant information. This means that as the system reviews more documents, it becomes increasingly accurate and efficient at identifying relevant information. This helps legal professionals to focus their efforts on documents that are most likely to be relevant, which in turn saves time and improves the overall efficiency of the discovery process.
Enhanced Accuracy and Consistency
Another advantage of TAR is that it improves the accuracy and consistency of the document review process. Unlike human reviewers, TAR systems do not suffer from fatigue or bias, which can lead to errors and inconsistencies in the review process. This means that the results of a TAR review are generally more accurate and consistent than those of a human review.
An eDiscovery software that offers TAR, such as Casepoint, also allows legal professionals to train the system to identify and prioritize specific types of documents. For example, if a legal team is working on a patent case, they can train the system to identify documents related to specific patents or technical terms. This helps to ensure that relevant documents are identified quickly and accurately, which improves the overall accuracy and efficiency of the discovery process.
Cost Savings
TAR can also result in significant cost savings for legal teams. Because the system can quickly review large volumes of data, it reduces the need for human reviewers, which in turn reduces labor costs. Additionally, because the system is generally more accurate and consistent than human reviewers, it can help to reduce the risk of costly errors or omissions in the review process.
Another cost-saving advantage of TAR is that it allows legal teams to identify and prioritize relevant documents quickly, which can help to reduce the overall cost of the discovery process. By focusing on relevant documents early in the process, legal teams can avoid wasting time and resources on irrelevant documents, which can ultimately lead to significant cost savings.
Improved Document Review Workflow
TAR can also help to improve the overall document review workflow. Because the system is automated, it can quickly and efficiently identify relevant documents, which allows legal professionals to focus on more complex tasks, such as legal analysis and strategy. Additionally, because the system is generally more accurate and consistent than human reviewers, it can help to reduce the risk of errors or omissions in the review process, which can lead to delays and additional costs.
TAR systems can also be integrated with other eDiscovery tools, such as case management and review platforms, which can help to further streamline the document review workflow. This integration allows legal teams to manage the entire discovery process from a single platform, which can save time and reduce the risk of errors or inconsistencies.
Scalability and Flexibility
Finally, TAR is highly scalable and flexible. Because the system is automated, it can quickly and efficiently review large volumes of data, which makes it ideal for large-scale discovery projects. Additionally, because the system is highly flexible, it can be customized to meet the specific needs of each project. This customization can include training the system to identify specific types of documents or to prioritize certain keywords or phrases.
TAR systems can also be easily integrated with other eDiscovery tools, which allows legal teams to tailor the discovery process to their specific needs. This scalability and flexibility make TAR an ideal solution for a wide range of eDiscovery projects.
Limitations of Technology-Assisted Review in eDiscovery
Inherent Bias and Error Rates
While TAR offers many advantages, it also has its limitations. One of the primary limitations of TAR is that it is subject to inherent bias and error rates. Because the system is based on machine learning algorithms, it can be influenced by the quality and relevance of the training data. If the training data is biased or incomplete, the system may produce biased or inaccurate results.
Additionally, because TAR is based on statistical analysis, it is subject to a certain level of error. While the error rates of TAR are generally lower than those of human reviewers, they can still be significant. This means that legal teams must carefully evaluate the results of a TAR review to ensure that they are accurate and reliable.
Dependence on Accurate Training Data
Another limitation of TAR is that it is highly dependent on accurate training data. The system relies on the quality and relevance of the training data to accurately identify and prioritize relevant documents. If the training data is incomplete or inaccurate, the system may produce inaccurate or irrelevant results.
To mitigate this risk, legal teams must carefully select and prepare the training data. This includes identifying relevant documents and ensuring that the training data accurately reflects the scope of the project. Additionally, legal teams must monitor the results of the TAR review to ensure that the system is producing accurate and reliable results.
Limited Understanding of Context and Nuance
TAR systems also have a limited understanding of context and nuance. While the system can identify specific keywords and phrases, it may not be able to accurately interpret the context in which those words or phrases are used. This means that the system may produce false positives or miss relevant documents that do not contain specific keywords or phrases.
To mitigate this risk, legal teams must carefully evaluate the results of a TAR review to ensure that they are accurate and reliable. This may involve reviewing a sample of the documents identified by the system to ensure that they are relevant and meet the criteria set by the legal team.
Difficulty Handling Multilingual Documents
TAR systems also have difficulty handling multilingual documents. Because the system relies on language-specific algorithms, it may not be able to accurately analyze documents in languages other than the one for which it was designed. This means that legal teams may need to use multiple TAR systems or rely on human reviewers to review multilingual documents.
To mitigate this risk, legal teams must carefully evaluate the scope of the project and identify the languages that will be involved. This will help them to select the appropriate TAR system and ensure that it is capable of accurately analyzing the relevant documents.
Potentially High Costs and Time Investment
Finally, TAR can potentially result in high costs and time investment. While the system can save time and reduce costs in the long run, it may require significant upfront costs and time investment to train the system and prepare the training data. Additionally, legal teams must carefully evaluate the results of the TAR review to ensure that they are accurate and reliable, which can also require significant time and resources.
To mitigate these risks, legal teams must carefully evaluate the potential benefits and costs of using TAR and ensure that they have the necessary resources and expertise to effectively implement the system.
Conclusion
TAR is a powerful tool that can help streamline the eDiscovery process and save time and resources. The use of machine learning, specifically active learning AI, has further improved the accuracy and efficiency of eDiscovery software such as Casepoint that use TAR. As the volume of electronic data continues to grow, the importance of TAR in eDiscovery will only continue to increase. Legal professionals should consider incorporating TAR into their eDiscovery process to improve accuracy, efficiency, and ultimately, the outcome for their clients.
Categories:
